Choose Rich Live
Tech

Major US banks block AI agents from moving customer funds

Financial institutions including JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, and Charles Schwab are restricting autonomous AI agents from accessing customer accounts and executing transactions.

Exterior building signage for J.P. Morgan with text reading 'Schwab and JPMorgan are blocking AI agents from moving customer money.'
Image: @thenextweb

A growing roster of major U.S. financial institutions is clamping down on autonomous artificial intelligence tools, barring third-party agents from logging into customer accounts or transferring funds following the rollout of agents such as Meta's Muse. Citigroup and Bank of America have joined JPMorgan Chase and Charles Schwab in blocking automated agents, according to reporting by Techstrong AI and crypto.news.[2][4][5]

Executives across the banking industry have cited significant operational and liability risks. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon has cautioned against 'rogue agents,' while Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan emphasized the need for a 'human in the loop,' Coin Bureau reported. Charles Schwab's chief executive questioned who bears liability if an automated tool transfers customer funds and noted the firm blocks unauthorized agents 10 to 20 times per week, according to TNW and Techstrong AI. Outside finance, Amazon similarly blocked Meta's Muse agent in September over terms-of-service violations.[1][3][5]

Beyond security, lenders face massive commercial incentives to restrict autonomous financial tools. Banks have warned regulators that AI agents could automatically sweep customer balances into accounts offering higher yields, per the Financial Times. According to Techstrong AI, redirecting roughly $1.6 trillion in zero-interest deposits to higher-yield alternatives could cost the banking sector an estimated $47 billion annually in additional interest payouts. Instead of granting full transactional access, institutions are developing gated, view-only frameworks for AI tools.[3][5]

Key facts

  • JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, and Charles Schwab are blocking AI agents from logging into customer accounts and moving money.
  • Schwab blocks unauthorized AI agents 10 to 20 times a week, and its CEO raised liability concerns regarding agents moving money.
  • Amazon blocked Meta's Muse agent in September, citing Conditions of Use violations.
  • Banks have warned regulators that autonomous AI agents could shift deposits into higher-yielding alternatives.
  • Sweeping an estimated $1.6 trillion in non-interest-bearing deposits into higher yields could cost the banking sector approximately $47 billion annually in interest.
  • Banks are developing gated, view-only frameworks for AI agents rather than permitting full transaction access.

Sources · 5 sources

  1. TN

    TNW@thenextwebPost on X ·

    Even Meta’s Muse gets blocked at Schwab. Its CEO asks who’s liable if an agent moves money. JPMorgan is drawing the same line. https://t.co/Q7SXBYloPC https://t.co/QoTc2hW1y0

    Open source
  2. CN

    crypto.news@cryptodotnewsPost on X ·

    JUST IN: Citi restricts AI agents from accessing customer accounts The move adds to a growing wave of U.S. banks tightening access for autonomous AI tools as financial institutions weigh security and control over account activity. https://t.co/I8tC9w34r3

    Open source
  3. CB

    Coin Bureau@coinbureauPost on X ·

    The AI agent crackdown has BEGUN. Your AI agent is now being BLOCKED by JPMorgan, Citi and Amazon. 1. JPMorgan bars outside agents from moving money in customer accounts, with Jamie Dimon warning of “rogue agents.” 2. Citi won’t let “third-party AI agents or assistants” log into accounts or transact. 3. Amazon blocked Meta’s Muse agent in September, saying unauthorized AI agents violate its Conditions of Use. 4. Bank of America has reportedly restricted access too, with CEO Brian Moynihan saying there should be a “human in the loop.” Banks have also warned regulators that AI agents could shift customers’ cash into accounts paying better rates, per the FT. If JPMorgan, BofA and Wells Fargo paid just 3% on their $1.6 TRILLION of zero-interest deposits, it would cost them $47 BILLION a year.

    Open source
  4. GI

    Gizmodo@GizmodoPost on X ·

    After Muse Launch, U.S. Banks Are Saying Hell No to AI Agents Moving Money https://t.co/81y9PTfLUS

    Open source
  5. TA

    Techstrong.ai@TechstrongaiPost on X ·

    Citigroup and Bank of America have joined Charles Schwab and JPMorgan in blocking AI agents from logging into customer accounts and moving money, with Schwab's CEO saying his firm blocks unauthorized agents ten to twenty times a week. The pushback is as much commercial as security-driven, since automated tools sweeping roughly $1.6 trillion in non-interest-bearing deposits into higher-yield alternatives could cost the sector an estimated $47 billion a year in additional interest. Read the full article on the gated, view-only frameworks banks are building instead: https://t.co/zGvOd1i9ox #Cybersecurity #AI #AIAgents #Banking #Fintech

    Open source